This site developed by Big Blend Magazine™. copyrighted since 1998. No part of it may be reproduced for any reason, with out written permission from Big Blend Magazine, P.O. Box 6201 North Hollywood, CA 91603. Opinions expressed by contributors are not necessarily that of this publication or any of its staff. We reserve the right to edit submittals. All subject matter is intended for general information only and not to be take as personal advice in any matter. Although every effort is made to be accurate, we cannot be held responsible for inaccuracies or plagiarized copy submitted to us by advertisers or contributors.
Issues Facing California's Desert National Parks
The National Parks Conservation Association Weighs in on the Future of Desert Solar Development and Opposes Water Board’s Approval to Drain the Desert.
Radio Interview and Mojave National Preserve photo by David Lamfrom
Future of Desert Solar Development
The Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Department of Energy (DOE), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), and the Department of the Interior’s (DOI) Final Solar Energy Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) was recently announced to the public, after months of refinements and years of input, public voice and process, and extensive review of natural and cultural resources in these poorly studied and biologically rich landscapes. The full final PEIS report can be accessed at:
Statement by David Lamfrom, California Desert Senior Program Manager, National Parks Conservation Association
“Today represents a step-
We encourage the administration to further refine their improved preferred alternative, to further remove sensitive variance lands from the 19 million acres currently proposed, including those surrounding Death Valley National Park, Joshua Tree National Park, and Mojave National Preserve. We also urge smart decision making when it comes to siting current and future applications on lands with sensitive natural and cultural resources and those rich in historic values.This process has been modified due to the recognition that there are right and wrong places for renewable energy development. We encourage continued refinements and incentives for siting projects in designated zones.”
“Our public lands and national parks in particular are a source of great pride, identity,
and income. This process helps protect many important conservation lands in the California
desert and throughout the Southwest. While refinements are needed, this is an important
step toward energy independence. This process and future decisions must protect our
most sensitive resources and most beautiful places for our generation, our children,
and grandchildren. We have entrusted these decisions to the Bureau of Land Management,
and require that they act in our shared interest.”
Water Board’s Approval to Drain the Desert
Statement by Seth Shteir, California Desert Field Representative, National Parks Conservation Association
“The Santa Margarita Water District’s board decision to certify what is essentially the Cadiz water mining project jeopardizes precious Mojave Desert groundwater resources, air quality, and the springs of the Mojave National Preserve. We feel the water board did not adequately consider all of the evidence before them, choosing instead to irresponsibly approve the Cadiz Inc. water withdrawal proposal. It’s ironic that the word ‘conservation’ is in the title of this project, as independent research has found exactly the opposite – that this project will not leave a drop for future generations.”
“The National Parks Conservation Association and a consortium of other environmental groups consulted with a hydrologist, who found that there are fundamental flaws in Cadiz’s hydrologic modeling. Independent research found the Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery and Storage project to be totally unsustainable, as it would pump more water out of the desert aquifer than would be replaced by natural recharge over the project’s 50 year lifespan. Despite Cadiz’s claims that their project won’t adversely impact the Mojave National Preserve’s springs, the National Park Service states that conclusion is premature and that some Preserve springs are likely connected to the deeper water table that would be subject to pumping.
“If this project is implemented, we’ll regret it in years to come because of the damage it will do to groundwater resources and the harm it could do to the springs of the Mojave National Preserve, one of our national treasures. In short, the proposed Cadiz project is simply poor policy that would take public water resources, privatize them, and ultimately sell them back to the public for profit. In comparison to our national parks, considered our country’s ‘best idea,’ this project is among the worst ideas for the health of the overall California desert and the many individuals, animals, ecosystems, and economies that rely on it. We must use long term thinking to ensure that our natural resources and national treasures such as Mojave National Preserve are protected and preserved for our children and grandchildren. The National Parks Conservation Association will not stand by and allow this project to move forward.”